The purpose of this study is to compare the two events, Jeju 4.3 and Cheondoism 3.1 emersion Movement. First, the spirit of Jeju 4.3 (human rights, peace, reconciliation) and the Cheondoism 3.1 emersion Movement are not different. Second, it is to prove that the spirit of Jeju 4.3 and the Cheondoism can contribute to inter-Korean reunification and global peace, not to remain in human rights, peace and reconciliation. Third, just as the Jeju 4.3 incident is out of silence, the movement to reproduce the Cheondoism 3.1 emersion Movement also seeks to improve its status in Korea. The content of this study is the process of transforming social memory into official memory through the struggle of the memory. First, Jeju 4.3 succeeded in changing official memory from “Red Riot” to “People’s Rebellion” through the struggle of the memory. Second, the Cheondoism 3.1 emersion Movement failed to convert social memory into official memory in the absence of the struggle of the memory. Third, Jeju 4.3 and Cheondoism 3.1 emersion Movement have universality and decisive differences. The results of this study were as follows: First, it was confirmed that the Jeju 4.3 incident and the Cheondoism 3.1 emersion movement inherited the spirit of the 3.1 movement 100 years ago, dreaming of human rights, resistance and democracy. Second, it was confirmed that the Jeju 4.3 incident and the Cheondoism 3.1 emersion movement were national unification movements that exceeded the popular and anti-airport struggles. Third, it was confirmed through the Gwangju 5.18 that the movement of reproducing the Cheondoism 3.1 emersion movement, still in silence and oblivion, as in the case of the Jeju 4.3 that survived in the politics of memory, was able to improve its status through the struggle of the memory.